Do you think that actions like wearing an armband to protest are the same as speech Why or why not?

Do you think that actions like wearing an armband to protest are the same as speech Why or why not?

The Supreme Court of the United States has ruled that certain actions have the same protection as verbal speech because actions can be a way of expressing an opinion.

Why does wearing armbands fall within the protection of the free speech clause quizlet?

Because the appearance of the armbands distracted students from their work, they detracted form the ability of the school officials to perform their duties, so the school district was well within its rights to discipline the students. Protects the right to freedom of expression and religion.

What were the armbands a protest for in the Tinker vs Des Moines case?

At a public school in Des Moines, Iowa, students planned to wear black armbands at school as a silent protest against the Vietnam War.

Why did the Supreme Court ruled in favor of the students who wore armbands?

They ruled in favor of the students. It held that armbands were form of “speech” because the armbands were symbols representing ideas.

Does Justice Fortas consider the armbands constitutionally protected speech?

Yes. Justice Abe Fortas delivered the opinion of the 7-2 majority. The Supreme Court held that the armbands represented pure speech that is entirely separate from the actions or conduct of those participating in it.

Which best describes how Tinker v Des Moines extended protected speech under the First Amendment?

Which best describes how Tinker v. Des Moines expanded protected speech under the First Amendment? The decision affirmed the protection of unpopular opinions.

Do you think that the school policy banning armbands was fair Why or why not?( Tinker v Des Moines?

Do you think that the school policy banning armbands was fair? Why or why not? Yes I do think it is fair because they had the right to wear that armband and it was message for free speech. The students knew they would be suspended if they wore armbands to school and chose to do so anyway.

How does the Fifth Amendment relate to the decision of Miranda v Arizona?

In the landmark supreme court case Miranda v. Arizona (1966), the Court held that if police do not inform people they arrest about certain constitutional rights, including their Fifth Amendment right against self-incrimination, then their confessions may not be used as evidence at trial.

What amendment is Tinker vs Des Moines?

The court found that the First Amendment applied to public schools, and school officials could not censor student speech unless it disrupted the educational process. Because wearing a black armband was not disruptive, the court held that the First Amendment protected the right of students to wear them.

Who won in the case of Tinker v Des Moines?

Decision: In 1969 the United States Supreme Court ruled in a 7-2 decision in favor of the students. The high court agreed that students’ free rights should be protected and said, “Students don’t shed their constitutional rights at the school house gates.”

What was the Supreme Court decision on armbands?

In a 7-2 decision, the Court found that the armbands were basically “pure speech” and that the school’s action was unconstitutional. In a famous phrase, Justice Fortas wrote, “It can hardly be argued that either students or teachers shed their constitutional rights to freedom of speech or expression at the schoolhouse gate…”

Why was black armbands allowed in public schools?

The Court ruled that the First Amendment applied to public schools, and school officials could not censor student speech unless it disrupted the educational process. Because wearing a black armband was not disruptive, the Court held that the First Amendment protected the right of students to wear one.

Why did Mary Beth Tinker wear black armbands?

Mary Beth Tinker was a 13-year-old junior high school student in December 1965 when she and a group of students decided to wear black armbands to school to protest the war in Vietnam.