Table of Contents
- 1 What was the decision in Wesberry v Sanders quizlet?
- 2 What did the Miller v Johnson decision state?
- 3 Do congressional districts have to have equal population?
- 4 How did wesberry decision affect representation in Congress quizlet?
- 5 What did the Supreme Court justices declare in Miller v Johnson 1995 )? Quizlet?
- 6 What was the decision in Bush v Vera?
- 7 How were slaves to be counted when determining congressional districts?
What was the decision in Wesberry v Sanders quizlet?
Wesberry v. Sanders, 376 U.S. 1 (1964) was a U.S. Supreme Court case involving U.S. Congressional districts in the state of Georgia. The Court issued its ruling on February 17, 1964. This decision requires each state to draw its U.S. Congressional districts so that they are approximately equal in population.
What did the Miller v Johnson decision state?
The United States Supreme Court affirmed the trial court’s finding. It held that the redistricting was so bizarre on its face that it was unexplainable on grounds other than race and therefore it could not be upheld unless it was narrowly tailored to achieve a compelling state interest.
Which Court case ruled that state legislative districts must be nearly equal in population?
Sims, 377 U.S. 533 (1964), was a United States Supreme Court case in which the Court ruled that the electoral districts of state legislative chambers must be roughly equal in population.
Do congressional districts have to have equal population?
Congressional districts are the 435 areas from which members are elected to the U.S. House of Representatives. Each congressional district is to be as equal in population to all other congressional districts in a state as practicable.
How did wesberry decision affect representation in Congress quizlet?
In the Wesberry vs Sanders case, the Supreme Court ruled that the Constitution demands that the states draw congressional districts of substantially equal populations. The large increase in population sizes has lead to Congress members having a hard time representing their constituents properly.
What was the decision in Baker v Carr quizlet?
Decision: The Warren Court reached a 6-2 verdict in favor of Baker. A lack of political question, previous court intervention in apportionment affairs and equal protection under the 14th amendment gave the court enough reason to rule on legislative apportionment. Court gained power to rule on apportionment laws.
What did the Supreme Court justices declare in Miller v Johnson 1995 )? Quizlet?
What did the Supreme Court justices declare in Miller v. Johnson (1995)? The racial composition of a district could not be the predominant factor when redistricting.
What was the decision in Bush v Vera?
The Supreme Court, in a plurality opinion, held that race was the predominant factor in the creation of the districts and that under a strict scrutiny standard the three districts were not narrowly tailored to further a compelling governmental interest.
What important principle did the Supreme Court establish in the cases of Baker v Carr and Reynolds v Sims?
In Reynolds v. Sims (1964), using the Supreme Court’s precedent set in Baker v. Carr (1962), Warren held that representation in state legislatures must be apportioned equally on the basis of population rather than geographical areas, remarking that “legislators represent people, not acres or trees.” In…
How were slaves to be counted when determining congressional districts?
According to Article 1, Section 2, of the Constitution, how were slaves to be counted when determining the number of congressional districts per state? Slaves were to be counted as 3/5. The Constitution states, “three-fifths all other persons.” (Section 2, Article 1).