Table of Contents
- 1 How did the use of stereotyping influence the jurors thinking?
- 2 What is the claim of 12 Angry Men?
- 3 Who is the second person to vote not guilty in 12 angry men?
- 4 What happens at the end of 12 angry jurors?
- 5 Why did Juror 3 change his vote?
- 6 What is Juror Eight’s reason for voting not guilty?
- 7 What is the summary of Twelve Angry Men?
- 8 Why did Reginald Rose write Twelve Angry Men?
How did the use of stereotyping influence the jurors thinking?
Obviously, many of the jurors had stereotypes about kids who grow up in slums—and who belong to certain minority groups. Not only did these stereotypes influence the jurors’ tendency to make internal attributions for the boy’s behavior, but these stereotypes also led to biased interpretations of the evidence.
What is the claim of 12 Angry Men?
“12 Angry Men” focuses on a jury’s deliberations in a capital murder case. A 12-man jury is sent to begin deliberations in the first-degree murder trial of an 18-year old Puerto Rican boy accused in the stabbing death of his father, where a guilty verdict means an automatic death sentence.
What factors influenced the jurors?
The data indicate that jurors were influenced by the evidence, witnesses, lawyers, and defendant in the trials. In two trials, jurors made their decisions early; one trial produced later decisions. The jurors’ reports also demonstrate that jurors considered evidence and discussed the key issues during deliberation.
How did the confirmation bias influence the juror’s decision making?
Confirmation bias leads us to prioritise information that confirms our unconscious initial decision. In 12 Angry Men, the majority of jurors are biased by the defendant’s background, or by their own prejudices. Consequently, they easily lap up the prosecution’s case.
Who is the second person to vote not guilty in 12 angry men?
The Jury
| Juror No. | Character | ‘Not guilty’ order |
|---|---|---|
| 2 | A meek bank teller who initially does not know what to make of the case. | 5 |
| 3 | A businessman with a hot temper. He is estranged from his son, and is convinced that the defendant is guilty. | 12 |
| 4 | A stockbroker; he is very eloquent and considers the case through facts and not bias. | 11 |
What happens at the end of 12 angry jurors?
After convincing the jury to give a Not Guilty verdict, Juror #8 walks over to #3, his nemesis, and puts his coat on for him. The gesture shows us that despite the extent to which they’ve argued in the jury room, there will be no hard feelings once they head back into the world.
Can you sway the jury?
Jury tampering is a crime that occurs when people improperly influence jurors. Jurors can also be improperly influenced—sometimes by their own doing—without anyone committing a crime. However it occurs, improper influence on jurors can effectively undo a criminal case and result in a new trial for the defendant.
What factors affect the verdict in a trial?
Variables considered include demographic information on jurors, personal characteristics of trial participants, influence of trial publicity on jurors, juror satisfaction with the verdict, and dynamics of the deliberation process.
Why did Juror 3 change his vote?
Why does Juror 3 change his vote to not guilty? Juror 3 changed his vote after realizing that all of his anger toward the defendant was a direct result of his bad relationship with his son. Due to his change of vote from guilty to not guilty, Juror 3 shows growth in character and is therefore considered dynamic.
What is Juror Eight’s reason for voting not guilty?
In the first vote, Juror 8 is the only one to vote not guilty. He does this not because he really feels that the defendant is necessarily innocent, but for another reason altogether. He votes not guilty because he feels that the group should discuss a case with such serious consequences before deciding.
Why did Juror 5 change his vote to not guilty?
Juror 3 and 12 bring up two important pieces of evidence supporting that the kid killed his dad. Why does Juror 5 change his vote? the old man could not have ‘run’ and even if he walked over he couldn’t have made his way over to the door as fast as he claimed. Juror 8 makes a new discovery as to why the boy is innocent …
What can a party do if they lose the trial?
Not often does a losing party have an automatic right of appeal. There usually must be a legal basis for the appeal—an alleged material error in the trial—not just the fact that the losing party didn’t like the verdict. In a civil case, either party may appeal to a higher court.
What is the summary of Twelve Angry Men?
Twelve Angry Men Summary. Twelve jurors retire to the jury room as a murder trial concludes. The charge is murder in the first degree, and the judge reminds the jurors that they must base their unanimous decision of “guilty” or “not guilty” on whether or not there is “reasonable doubt” in their minds as to the guilt of the accused.
Why did Reginald Rose write Twelve Angry Men?
Playwright Reginald Rose was inspired to write the play Twelve Angry Men after his own experiences serving on a jury left him fascinated by the procedures and dynamics involved when twelve disparate individuals are forced into a small room and instructed to render a verdict on someone else’s life. A…
Who is prejudiced against the defendant in 12 Angry Men?
Similarly, 3rd Juror is prejudiced against the defendant because he reminds him of his own son, from whom he is estranged. On the other extreme, 8th Juror is prejudiced to give the defendant special consideration because he had a hard upbringing and comes from a poor background.
How did four silence seven in Twelve Angry Men?
Four silences Seven by saying that no one is asking where anyone, or their fathers, came from. Two raises something that has been bothering him about the case. The stab wound appears to have been made downward from above, as if the attacker was taller than the victim.