Table of Contents
- 1 Why did Anti-Federalists believed that the Constitution was a threat to liberty quizlet?
- 2 Why did the Anti-Federalists believe the Constitution was important?
- 3 What were the main points of disagreement between the Antifederalists and the Federalists?
- 4 How did the Anti-Federalists and federalists differ in their views on national government?
Why did Anti-Federalists believed that the Constitution was a threat to liberty quizlet?
The Anti Federalists feared that the national government would become too powerful and limit personal rights. The Anti Federalists insisted on a Bill of Rights added to the US Constitution to protect citizens’ rights.
Why did the Anti-Federalists believe the Constitution was important?
First, they believed that the new Constitution consolidated too much power in the hands of Congress, at the expense of states. Third, they believed that the liberties of the people were best protected when power resided in state governments, as opposed to a federal one.
Why did the Anti-Federalists propose a bill of rights quizlet?
People opposed to the ratification of the Constitution were called the Anti-Federalists. They were concerned that the Constitution gave too much power to the national government at the expense of the state governments. They believed that a bill of rights was essential to protect the people from the federal government.
How did the Antifederalists and federalists differ in their views on national government?
The Federalists wanted a strong government and strong executive branch, while the anti-Federalists wanted a weaker central government. The Federalists did not want a bill of rights —they thought the new constitution was sufficient. The anti-federalists demanded a bill of rights.
What were the main points of disagreement between the Antifederalists and the Federalists?
The Federalists felt that this addition wasn’t necessary, because they believed that the Constitution as it stood only limited the government not the people. The Anti- Federalists claimed the Constitution gave the central government too much power, and without a Bill of Rights the people would be at risk of oppression.