What were the arguments for and against the Constitution?

What were the arguments for and against the Constitution?

The Federalists wanted a strong government and strong executive branch, while the anti-Federalists wanted a weaker central government. The Federalists did not want a bill of rights —they thought the new constitution was sufficient. The anti-federalists demanded a bill of rights.

Who was an anti federalist who opposed the Constitution?

Anti-Federalists, in early U.S. history, a loose political coalition of popular politicians, such as Patrick Henry, who unsuccessfully opposed the strong central government envisioned in the U.S. Constitution of 1787 and whose agitations led to the addition of a Bill of Rights.

Why did the Anti-Federalists favored strong state governments because?

They feared that a strong central government would overpower state governments, and eventually state governments would lose their independence and influence.

What was the purpose of the anti Federalist Papers?

Starting on 25 September 1787 (eight days after the final draft of the US Constitution) and running through the early 1790s, these anti-Federalists published a series of essays arguing against a stronger and more energetic union as embodied in the new Constitution.

What did Anti-Federalists argue quizlet?

The Anti-Federalists argued that the new Constitution would destroy the liberties won in the American Revolution. They believed the new Constitution would create a national government so powerful that it would ignore the rights of the states. It had no bill of rights to protect individual freedoms.

What was a major argument used by the Anti-Federalists to oppose ratifying the Constitution?

In the ratification debate, the Anti-Federalists opposed to the Constitution. They complained that the new system threatened liberties, and failed to protect individual rights. One faction opposed the Constitution because they thought stronger government threatened the sovereignty of the states.

What are arguments between federalists and Anti-Federalists?

Federalists were supporters of the constitution, while Anti federalist were against the ratification of the Constitution. Federalists believed in the idea of a larger heterogeneous republic whereas anti federalists wanted a small homogenous republic.

What are the main argument of the Antifederalists?

The Anti- Federalist feared a national government would strip citizens of their individual rights. The Anti-Federalists did not want a repeat of the Revolutionary War. The Federalists main argument was a large republic would be vulnerable to aggression from foreign powers,…

What were the Antifederalists against and why?

The Anti-Federalists opposed the ratification of the 1787 U.S. Constitution because they feared that the new national government would be too powerful and thus threaten individual liberties, given the absence of a bill of rights. Their opposition was an important factor leading to the adoption of the First Amendment and the other nine amendments that constitute the Bill of Rights.

What did the Anti-federalists argue?

Anti-federalists argued that the ratification of the constitution was needed and that a strong federal government should not happen. They wanted the power in local and state governments.